Cosmopolitanism and Competition: Probing the Limits of Egalitarian Justice

Economics and Philosophy 33 (1):91-124 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper develops a novel competition criterion for evaluating institutional schemes. Roughly, this criterion says that one institutional scheme is normatively superior to another to the extent that the former would engender more widespread political competition than the latter. I show that this criterion should be endorsed by both global egalitarians and their statist rivals, as it follows from their common commitment to the moral equality of all persons. I illustrate the normative import of the competition criterion by exploring its potential implications for the scope of egalitarian principles of distributive justice. In particular, I highlight the challenges it raises for global egalitarians' efforts to justify extending the scope of egalitarian justice beyond the state.
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WIECAC
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-02-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 40 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-02-10

Total views
337 ( #11,772 of 46,245 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
60 ( #13,000 of 46,245 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.