Dawkins’s Gambit, Hume’s Aroma, and God’s Simplicity

Philosophia Christi 11 (1):113-127 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I examine the central atheistic argument of Richard Dawkins’s book The God Delusion (“Dawkins’s Gambit”) and illustrate its failure. I further show that Dawkins’s Gambit is a fragment of a more comprehensive critique of theism found in David Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Among the failings of Dawkins’s Gambit is that it is directed against a version of the God Hypothesis that few traditional monotheists hold. Hume’s critique is more challenging in that it targets versions of the God Hypothesis that are central to traditional monotheism. Theists and atheists should put away The God Delusion and pick up Hume’s Dialogues.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WIEDGH
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-09-29

Total views
3,147 ( #277 of 39,579 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
217 ( #1,545 of 39,579 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.