Demands of Justice, Feasible Alternatives, and the Need for Causal Analysis

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):325-338 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Many political philosophers hold the Feasible Alternatives Principle (FAP): justice demands that we implement some reform of international institutions P only if P is feasible and P improves upon the status quo from the standpoint of justice. The FAP implies that any argument for a moral requirement to implement P must incorporate claims whose content pertains to the causal processes that explain the current state of affairs. Yet, philosophers routinely neglect the need to attend to actual causal processes. This undermines their arguments concerning moral requirements to reform international institutions. The upshot is that philosophers’ arguments must engage in causal analysis to a greater extent than is typical. -/- [Supplement: Handout available at http://db.tt/fyuVW3Xv].
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WIEDOJ
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 2 (2015-11-21)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
"Actual" Does Not Imply "Feasible".Southwood, Nicholas & Wiens, David
The Feasibility Issue.Southwood, Nicholas

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-02-22

Total views
553 ( #6,254 of 46,448 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #21,038 of 46,448 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.