The Ontological Argument and Objects of Thought

Philosophic Exchange 42 (1):82-103 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Is there anything new to be said about Anselm's ontological argument? Recent work by Lynne Baker and Gareth Matthews raises some interesting and important questions about the argument. First, Anselm's argument is set in the context of a prayer to God, whose existence Anselm seeks to prove. Is that peculiar or paradoxical? Does it imply that Anselm's prayer is insincere? Baker and Matthews have offered a novel interpretation of Anselm's argument, designed to solve a crucial problem with it. Does their interpretation succeed in solving that problem? This paper addresses both of these questions.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WIETOA
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-06-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-02-24

Total views
41 ( #38,372 of 44,318 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #20,778 of 44,318 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.