An Argument Against Treating Non-Human Animal Bodies as Commodities

Journal of Value Inquiry:1-13 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some animal defenders are committed to complete abstinence from animal products. However the strongest arguments for adopting veganism only seem to require that one avoid using animal products, where use or procurement of these products will harm sentient animals. As such, there is seemingly a gap between our intuition and our argument. In this article I attempt to defend the more comprehensive claim that we have a moral reason to avoid using animal products, regardless of the method of procurement. I argue that animal bodies give rise to properties which grant sentient animals’ moral status and in light of this, animal bodies possess final value in themselves. This final value gives us a moral reason not to commodify animal bodies, which means we have a defeasible reason to abstain from using animal products in almost all circumstances.

Author's Profile

Marc G Wilcox
University of Leeds (PhD)

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-15

Downloads
574 (#26,731)

6 months
272 (#7,584)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?