An argument for the many

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
If one believes that vagueness is an exclusively representational phenomenon, one faces the problem of the many. In the vicinity of Kilimanjaro, there are many many ‘mountain candidates’ all, apparently, with more-or-less equal claim to be mountains. David Lewis has defended a radical claim: that all the billions of mountain candidates are mountains. This paper argues that the supervaluationist about vagueness should adopt Lewis’ proposal, on pain of losing their best explanation of the seductiveness of the sorites.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WILAAF
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-11-02
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
252 ( #26,878 of 65,546 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #57,627 of 65,546 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.