A Remark on Iffy Oughts

Journal of Philosophy 109 (7):449-461 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Every adequate semantics for conditionals and deontic ought must offer a solution to the miners paradox about conditional obligations. Kolodny and MacFarlane have recently argued that such a semantics must reject the validity of modus ponens. I demonstrate that rejecting the validity of modus ponens is inessential for an adequate solution to the paradox.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WILARO-4
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 2 (2015-11-21)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Epistemic Modals.Seth Yalcin - 2007 - Mind 116 (464):983-1026.
Ifs and Oughts.Kolodny, Niko & MacFarlane, John

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-06-12

Total views
260 ( #14,170 of 44,261 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #23,156 of 44,261 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.