Collective Intentionality in Non-Human Animals

In Marija Jankovic and Kirk Ludwig (ed.), Routledge Handbook on Collective Intentionality. New York, NY, USA: pp. 420-432 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I think there is something to be said in a positive and constructive vein about collective intentionality in non-human animals. Doing so involves probing at the concept of collective intentionality fairly directly (Section 2), considering the various forms that collective intentionality might take (Section 3), showing some sensitivity to the history of appeals to that concept and its close relatives (Section 4), and raising some broader questions about the relationships between sociality, cognition, and institutions by discussing two different possible cases of collective intentionality in non-human animals: that of the social insects (Section 5) and that of highly social mammals, such as canines (Section 6). If the discussion here is on track, then the widely shared perspective on collective intentionality exemplified by the work of Searle and Tomasello needs to be reconsidered.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-07-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Extended Mind.Clark, Andy & Chalmers, David J.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Eugenic Thinking.Wilson, Robert A.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
147 ( #26,188 of 48,871 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #15,952 of 48,871 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.