Explanation = Unification? A New Criticism of Friedman’s Theory and a Reply to an Old One

Philosophy of Science 84 (3):391-413 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to Michael Friedman’s theory of explanation, a law X explains laws Y1, Y2, …, Yn precisely when X unifies the Y’s, where unification is understood in terms of reducing the number of independently acceptable laws. Philip Kitcher criticized Friedman’s theory but did not analyze the concept of independent acceptability. Here we show that Kitcher’s objection can be met by modifying an element in Friedman’s account. In addition, we argue that there are serious objections to the use that Friedman makes of the concept of independent acceptability.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WILEU
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-03-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-03-02

Total views
84 ( #23,854 of 38,105 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #15,902 of 38,105 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.