Explanation = Unification? A New Criticism of Friedman’s Theory and a Reply to an Old One

Philosophy of Science 84 (3):391-413 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to Michael Friedman’s theory of explanation, a law X explains laws Y1, Y2, …, Yn precisely when X unifies the Y’s, where unification is understood in terms of reducing the number of independently acceptable laws. Philip Kitcher criticized Friedman’s theory but did not analyze the concept of independent acceptability. Here we show that Kitcher’s objection can be met by modifying an element in Friedman’s account. In addition, we argue that there are serious objections to the use that Friedman makes of the concept of independent acceptability.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WILEU
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-03-02
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-03-02

Total views
280 ( #17,514 of 53,528 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
41 ( #16,028 of 53,528 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.