Le concept de psychopathie est-il cohérent ? Bases cérébrales et responsabilité morale

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Although many psychiatrists regard psychopathy as a coherent scientific construction, some clinicians and philosophers regard it as irrelevant. According to the latter, psychopathy is nothing more than a means of social control. The present study focuses on the issues of the neurological bases and moral responsibility related to psychopathy. While neuroscience aims to identify dysfunctions in psychopaths, action theory and ethics tend to vindicate the hypothesis of the moral irresponsibility of the psychopath. However, rather than reinforcing the concept of psychopathy, recent results in neuroscience tend to stress its incoherence. Philosophical speculations on psychopaths’ responsibility are not sufficiently empirically informed and seem to announce endless ethical debates.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WILLCD-6
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-06-07
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-06-07

Total views
117 ( #37,283 of 58,330 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #32,766 of 58,330 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.