Generalized probabilism: Dutch books and accuracy domi- nation

Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (5):811-840 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Jeff Paris proves a generalized Dutch Book theorem. If a belief state is not a generalized probability then one faces ‘sure loss’ books of bets. In Williams I showed that Joyce’s accuracy-domination theorem applies to the same set of generalized probabilities. What is the relationship between these two results? This note shows that both results are easy corollaries of the core result that Paris appeals to in proving his dutch book theorem. We see that every point of accuracy-domination defines a dutch book, but we only have a partial converse
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WILMAT-6
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-11-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Graded Incoherence for Accuracy-Firsters.De Bona, Glauber & Staffel, Julia
Rational Illogicality.Williams, J. Robert G.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-10-08

Total views
94 ( #24,131 of 39,619 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #39,112 of 39,619 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.