Nonclassical Minds and Indeterminate Survival

Philosophical Review 123 (4):379-428 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Revisionary theories of logic or truth require revisionary theories of mind. This essay outlines nonclassically based theories of rational belief, desire, and decision making, singling out the supervaluational family for special attention. To see these nonclassical theories of mind in action, this essay examines a debate between David Lewis and Derek Parfit over what matters in survival. Lewis argued that indeterminacy in personal identity allows caring about psychological connectedness and caring about personal identity to amount to the same thing. The essay argues that Lewis's treatment of two of Parfit's puzzle cases—degreed survival and fission—presuppose different nonclassical treatments of belief and desire
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-11-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
How Things Persist.Hawley, Katherine

View all 64 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Indeterminate Oughts.Williams, J. Robert G.
Deep Indeterminacy in Physics and Fiction.Darby, George; Pickup, Martin & Robson, Jon
Rational Illogicality.Williams, J. Robert G.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
98 ( #28,452 of 44,235 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #16,976 of 44,235 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.