There’s nothing to beat a backward clock: A rejoinder to Adams, Barker and Clarke

Logos and Episteme 7 (3):363-378 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Neil Sinhababu and I presented Backward Clock, an original counterexample to Robert Nozick’s truth-tracking analysis of propositional knowledge. Fred Adams, John Barker and Murray Clarke argue that Backward Clock is no such counterexample. Their argument fails to nullify Backward Clock which also shows that other tracking analyses, such as Dretske’s and one that Adams et al. may well have in mind, are inadequate.

Author's Profile

John N. Williams
Singapore Management University

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-06

Downloads
486 (#46,560)

6 months
125 (#38,150)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?