There’s nothing to beat a backward clock: A rejoinder to Adams, Barker and Clarke

Logos and Episteme 7 (3):363-378 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Neil Sinhababu and I presented Backward Clock, an original counterexample to Robert Nozick’s truth-tracking analysis of propositional knowledge. Fred Adams, John Barker and Murray Clarke argue that Backward Clock is no such counterexample. Their argument fails to nullify Backward Clock which also shows that other tracking analyses, such as Dretske’s and one that Adams et al. may well have in mind, are inadequate.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WILTNT-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-01-08
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Conclusive Reasons.Dretske, Fred I.
The Backward Clock, Truth-Tracking, and Safety.Williams, John N. & Sinhababu, Neil

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-10-06

Total views
52 ( #31,922 of 40,766 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #32,139 of 40,766 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.