On the dangers of making scientific models ontologically independent: Taking Richard Levins' warnings seriously

Biology and Philosophy 21 (5):703-724 (2006)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Levins and Lewontin have contributed significantly to our philosophical understanding of the structures, processes, and purposes of biological mathematical theorizing and modeling. Here I explore their separate and joint pleas to avoid making abstract and ideal scientific models ontologically independent by confusing or conflating our scientific models and the world. I differentiate two views of theorizing and modeling, orthodox and dialectical, in order to examine Levins and Lewontin’s, among others, advocacy of the latter view. I compare the positions of these two views with respect to four points regarding ontological assumptions: (1) the origin of ontological assumptions, (2) the relation of such assumptions to the formal models of the same theory, (3) their use in integrating and negotiating different formal models of distinct theories, and (4) their employment in explanatory activity. Dialectical is here used in both its Hegelian–Marxist sense of opposition and tension between alternative positions and in its Platonic sense of dialogue between advocates of distinct theories. I investigate three case studies, from Levins and Lewontin as well as from a recent paper of mine, that show the relevance and power of the dialectical understanding of theorizing and modeling.
Reprint years
2007
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WINOTD
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
418 ( #11,349 of 53,607 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #28,963 of 53,607 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.