The Genetic Reification of 'Race'? A Story of Two Mathematical Methods

Critical Philosophy of Race 2 (2):204-223 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Two families of mathematical methods lie at the heart of investigating the hierarchical structure of genetic variation in Homo sapiens: /diversity partitioning/, which assesses genetic variation within and among pre-determined groups, and /clustering analysis/, which simultaneously produces clusters and assigns individuals to these “unsupervised” cluster classifications. While mathematically consistent, these two methodologies are understood by many to ground diametrically opposed claims about the reality of human races. Moreover, modeling results are sensitive to assumptions such as preexisting theoretical commitments to certain linguistic, anthropological, and geographic human groups. Thus, models can be perniciously reified. That is, they can be conflated and confused with the world. This fact belies standard realist and antirealist interpretations of “race,” and supports a pluralist conventionalist interpretation.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WINTGR
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 9 (2015-11-21)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-12-22

Total views
3,641 ( #728 of 64,187 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
146 ( #3,712 of 64,187 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.