On Argument "Ex Suppositione Falsa"

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 15 (3):227 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In my opinion it cannot be denied but that your discourse carries with it much of probability, arguing, as we say, ex suppositione, namely, granting that the Earth moves with the two motions assigned it by Copernicus; but, if one excludes those motions, all that you have said is vain and invalid; and for the exclusion of that hypothesis, it is very manifestly hinted by your discourse itself.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
2,049 (#5,692)

6 months
85 (#64,787)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?