Mandatory Minimums and the War on Drugs

In David Boonin (ed.), Palgrave Handbook of Philosophy and Public Policy. Palgrave (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Mandatory minimum sentencing provisions have been a feature of the U.S. justice system since 1790. But they have expanded considerably under the war on drugs, and their use has expanded considerably under the Trump Administration; some states are also poised to expand drug-related mandatory minimums further in efforts to fight the current opioid epidemic. In this paper I outline and evaluate three prominent arguments for and against the use of mandatory minimums in the war on drugsā€”they appeal, respectively, to proportionality, consistency, and efficiency. I ultimately defend the view that the use of mandatory minimums in the war on drugs is unjust.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-04-13
Latest version: 2 (2019-11-24)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
177 ( #23,667 of 50,175 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #13,056 of 50,175 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.