Is an Atheist Unjust? Theism vs. Atheism Debate in the Light of Moral and Epistemic Imperatives

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7 (1):89--103 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the article I reconstruct Karol Wojtyła’s argument against atheism. According to Wojtyła, an atheist is unjust because of not rendering absolute honour to God. In my opinion the argument is sound if one applies it to theists or negative atheists and if one presupposes that there are moral obligations to only supposed persons. The argument meets some objections. A discussion of them leads me to an interpretation of the theism-atheism controversy as being the conflict of two imperatives: the imperative of justice and the imperative of evidence.

Author's Profile

Jacek Wojtysiak
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-10

Downloads
753 (#9,665)

6 months
28 (#37,102)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?