‘The Ordinary’ in Stanley Cavell and Jacques Derrida

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper analyses the opposing accounts of ‘the ordinary’ given by Jacques Derrida and Stanley Cavell, beginning with their competing interpretations of J. L. Austin¹s thought on ordinary language. These accounts are presented as mutually critiquing: Derrida¹s deconstructive method poses an effective challenge to Cavell¹s claim that the ordinary is irreducible by further philosophical analysis, while, conversely, Cavell¹s valorisation of the human draws attention to a residual humanity in Derrida¹s text which Derrida cannot account for. The two philosophers’ approaches are, in fact, predicated on each other like the famous Gestalt-image of a vase and two faces: they cannot come into focus at the same time, but one cannot appear without the other to furnish its background.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
How to Do Things with Words.Austin, John Langshaw
Margins of Philosophy.Derrida, Jacques
Limited Inc.Derrida, Jacques

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
486 ( #8,495 of 50,263 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #20,026 of 50,263 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.