‘The Ordinary’ in Stanley Cavell and Jacques Derrida

Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 17 (1) (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper analyses the opposing accounts of ‘the ordinary’ given by Jacques Derrida and Stanley Cavell, beginning with their competing interpretations of J. L. Austin¹s thought on ordinary language. These accounts are presented as mutually critiquing: Derrida¹s deconstructive method poses an effective challenge to Cavell¹s claim that the ordinary is irreducible by further philosophical analysis, while, conversely, Cavell¹s valorisation of the human draws attention to a residual humanity in Derrida¹s text which Derrida cannot account for. The two philosophers’ approaches are, in fact, predicated on each other like the famous Gestalt-image of a vase and two faces: they cannot come into focus at the same time, but one cannot appear without the other to furnish its background.

Author's Profile

Judith Wolfe
University of St. Andrews

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-11-01

Downloads
669 (#12,101)

6 months
45 (#29,531)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?