Barry and Øverland on doing, allowing, and enabling harm

Ethics and Global Politics 12 (1):43-51 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In Responding to Global Poverty: Harm, Responsibility, and Agency, Christian Barry and Gerhard Øverland address the two types of argument that have dominated discussion of the responsibilities of the affluent to respond to global poverty. The second type of argument appeals to ‘contribution-based responsibilities’: the affluent have a duty to do something about the plight of the global poor because they have contributed to that plight. Barry and Øverland rightly recognize that to assess contribution-based responsibility for global poverty, we need to understand what it is for an agent to contribute to harm rather than merely failing to prevent it. Barry and Øverland argue that we should replace the traditional bipartite distinction doing and allowing with a bipartite distinction between doing, allowing and enabling. I argue that their discussion represents a significant contribution to this debate. However, more detail on their key ideas of ‘relevant action’ and ‘complete causal process’ is needed. Moreover, in cases involving the removal of barriers, the non-need based claims of those involved matter.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-09-18
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Dif.Vihvelin, Kadri & Tomkow, Terrance A.
The Dif.Tomkow, Terrance
The Act Itself. [REVIEW]Thomson, Judith Jarvis

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
22 ( #43,955 of 45,271 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #39,750 of 45,271 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.