Explanatory Indispensability and Deliberative Indispensability: Against Enoch's Analogy

Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 5 (4):226-235 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this note, I discuss David Enoch's influential deliberative indispensability argument for metanormative realism, and contend that the argument fails. In doing so, I uncover an important disanalogy between explanatory indispensability arguments and deliberative indispensability arguments, one that explains how we could accept the former without accepting the latter.
Reprint years
2016
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WOREIA-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-09-06
Latest version: 2 (2016-09-19)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Last Word.Nagel, Thomas
How Are Basic Belief-Forming Methods Justified?Enoch, David & Schechter, Joshua

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-09-06

Total views
300 ( #15,011 of 50,290 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #19,994 of 50,290 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.