HIT and brain reward function: a case of mistaken identity (theory)

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper employs a case study from the history of neuroscience—brain reward function—to scrutinize the inductive argument for the so-called ‘Heuristic Identity Theory’ (HIT). The case fails to support HIT, illustrating why other case studies previously thought to provide empirical support for HIT also fold under scrutiny. After distinguishing two different ways of understanding the types of identity claims presupposed by HIT and considering other conceptual problems, we conclude that HIT is not an alternative to the traditional identity theory so much as a relabeling of previously discussed strategies for mechanistic discovery.
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WRIHAB
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-07-30
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Top-Down Causation Without Top-Down Causes.Craver, Carl F. & Bechtel, William

View all 42 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-08-21

Total views
179 ( #17,438 of 41,572 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
61 ( #9,357 of 41,572 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.