HIT and brain reward function: a case of mistaken identity (theory)

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper employs a case study from the history of neuroscience—brain reward function—to scrutinize the inductive argument for the so-called ‘Heuristic Identity Theory’ (HIT). The case fails to support HIT, illustrating why other case studies previously thought to provide empirical support for HIT also fold under scrutiny. After distinguishing two different ways of understanding the types of identity claims presupposed by HIT and considering other conceptual problems, we conclude that HIT is not an alternative to the traditional identity theory so much as a relabeling of previously discussed strategies for mechanistic discovery.
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WRIHAB
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-07-30
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-08-21

Total views
332 ( #14,751 of 53,592 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
60 ( #10,006 of 53,592 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.