Abstract

Intensive relations between philosophical deconstruction and architecture, which were present in the late 1980s and early 1990s, belong to the past and therefore can be described with greater objectivity. Within these relations three basic variations can be distinguished: the first one, in which philosophy of deconstruction deals with architectural terms but does not interfere with real architecture. In this version of the account, philosophy explored the architectural metaphors used by philosophers, but ignored real architecture. This stage was a shaky balance between pure philosophy and the philosophical concepts of architects; the second one, in which a collaboration between Jacques Derrida and a group of architects interested in his concepts is commenced. The philosopher managed to impose on Eisenman and Tschumi the subject of the philosophy of chôra. In addition to working directly with the philosopher, both architects introduced in their publications many concepts that developed the philosophy of deconstruction; and the third one, in which completed or only designed objects or new concepts of deconstruction created by architects gain their supremacy over philosophy. A special feature of this stage of the account was the contribution of architectural works to philosophy. A situation has arisen where works of art are primarily of value as philosophical statements. The following book analyses these three possible ways, first of all with the reference to Peter Eisenman and Bernard Tschumi.