Failing to do things with words

Southwest Philosophy Review 25 (1):135-142 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
It has become standard for feminist philosophers of language to analyze Catherine MacKinnon's claim in terms of speech act theory. Backed by the Austinian observation that speech can do things and the legal claim that pornography is speech, the claim is that the speech acts performed by means of pornography silence women. This turns upon the notion of illocutionary silencing, or disablement. In this paper I observe that the focus by feminist philosophers of language on the failure to achieve uptake for illocutionary acts serves to group together different kinds of illocutionary silencing which function in very different ways.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 2 (2016-01-29)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
On Silencing and Systematicity: The Challenge of the Drowning Case.McGowan, Mary Kate; Walder‐Biesanz, Ilana; Rezaian, Morvareed & Emerson, Chloe

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total downloads
948 ( #1,541 of 37,097 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
116 ( #2,620 of 37,097 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.