Suffering, Euthanasia and Professional Expertise

Solidarity: The Journal of Catholic Social Thought and Secular Ethics 6 (1):Article 5 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In most jurisdictions where euthanasia is legal, patients seeking euthanasia need to seek out the approval of their request from two clinicians (one of who is a psychiatrist). These doctors are required to assess whether euthanasia is ‘appropriate’ for the patient in question. In this paper I claim that doctors qua doctors are not qualified (or, at least, not typically) to evaluate suffering of an existential kind, and consequently they are not qualified to 'evaluate' the requests of patients seeking euthanasia. Importantly, this argument is only focused on patients who are seeking euthanasia on account of acute suffering. To defend my central thesis, I discuss the limits of the professional expertise of clinicians, in addition to considering the nature of suffering experienced by patients requesting euthanasia (which is, typically, a combination of physiological, psychological and existential suffering).

Author's Profile

Xavier Symons
Harvard University

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-11

Downloads
537 (#41,900)

6 months
83 (#68,489)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?