Suffering, Euthanasia and Professional Expertise

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In most jurisdictions where euthanasia is legal, patients seeking euthanasia need to seek out the approval of their request from two clinicians (one of who is a psychiatrist). These doctors are required to assess whether euthanasia is ‘appropriate’ for the patient in question. In this paper I claim that doctors qua doctors are not qualified (or, at least, not typically) to evaluate suffering of an existential kind, and consequently they are not qualified to 'evaluate' the requests of patients seeking euthanasia. Importantly, this argument is only focused on patients who are seeking euthanasia on account of acute suffering. To defend my central thesis, I discuss the limits of the professional expertise of clinicians, in addition to considering the nature of suffering experienced by patients requesting euthanasia (which is, typically, a combination of physiological, psychological and existential suffering).
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
XAVSEA
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-01-11
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-01-11

Total views
173 ( #24,474 of 51,423 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #26,662 of 51,423 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.