Imagining Dinosaurs

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is a tendency to take mounted dinosaur skeletons at face value, as the raw data on which the science of paleontology is founded. But the truth is that mounted dinosaur skeletons are substantially intention-dependent—they are artifacts. More importantly, I argue, they are also substantially imagination-dependent: their production is substantially causally reliant on preparators’ creative imaginations, and their proper reception is predicated on audiences’ recreative imaginations. My main goal here is to show that dinosaur skeletal mounts are plausible candidates for art-status. But, what is more, I think they are artworks—specifically, sculptures.

Author's Profile

Michel-Antoine Xhignesse
Capilano University

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-16

Downloads
455 (#52,492)

6 months
197 (#13,397)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?