Nonexistence and Aboutness: The Bandersnatches of Dubuque

Critica 52 (154) (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Holmes exists is false. How can this be, when there is no one for the sentence to misdescribe? Part of the answer is that a sentence’s topic depends on context. The king of France is bald, normally unevaluable, is false qua description of the bald people. Likewise Holmes exists is false qua description of the things that exist; it misdescribes those things as having Holmes among them. This does not explain, though, how Holmes does not exist differs in cognitive content from, say, Vulcan does not exist. Our answer builds on an observation of Kripke’s: even if Holmes exists, he is not in this room, for we were all born too late.

Author's Profile

Stephen Yablo
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-03

Downloads
318 (#52,662)

6 months
89 (#50,151)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?