Defensiveness and Identity

Journal of the American Philosophical Association:1-20 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Criticism can sometimes provoke defensive reactions, particularly when it implicates identities people hold dear. For instance, feminists told they are upholding rape culture might become angry or upset, since the criticism conflicts with an identity that is important to them. These kinds of defensive reactions are a primary focus of this paper. What is it to be defensive in this way, and why do some kinds of criticism, or implied criticism, tend to provoke this kind of response? What are the connections between defensiveness, identity, and active ignorance? What are the social, political, and epistemic consequences of the tendency to defensiveness? Are there ways to improve the situation?

Author Profiles

Jonathan Ichikawa
University of British Columbia
Audrey Yap
University of Victoria

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-03

Downloads
504 (#33,835)

6 months
187 (#15,516)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?