Folk Psychology and Moral Evaluation

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Assessments of an action done intentionally, as we might expect, influence judgments of moral responsibility. What we don't expect is the converse--judgments of moral responsibility influencing assessments of whether an action was done intentionally. Yet this is precisely how people decide, according to Knobe (2003, 2004) and Mendlow (2004) and Nadelhoffer (2004a). I evaluate whether the studies actually support this biasing effect. I argue that the studies are at best inconclusive and that even if they demonstrated that people fall under the biasing effect, such tendencies ought to have no bearing upon philosophical analyses of the concept of intentional action.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
YOOFPA
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2010-08-19

Total views
462 ( #14,149 of 64,201 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #21,243 of 64,201 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.