The Philosopher as Moral Activist: A Call for Ethical Caution in Publication

Essays in Philosophy 21 (1):46-75 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It is normal to think that philosophers’ first dedication is to the truth. Publishers and writers consider ideas and papers according to criteria such as originality, eloquence, interestingness, soundness, and plausibility. I suggest that moral consequence should play a greater role in our choices to publish when serious harm is at stake. One’s credence in a particular idea should be weighed against the potential consequences of the publication of one’s ideas both if one turns out to be right and if one turns out to be wrong. This activist approach to philosophical writing combines moral concern with epistemic humility.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
YORTPA
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-02-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2020-02-14

Total views
8 ( #47,346 of 46,458 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #46,063 of 46,458 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.