The Philosopher as Moral Activist: A Call for Ethical Caution in Publication

Essays in Philosophy 21 (1):46-75 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It is normal to think that philosophers’ first dedication is to the truth. Publishers and writers consider ideas and papers according to criteria such as originality, eloquence, interestingness, soundness, and plausibility. I suggest that moral consequence should play a greater role in our choices to publish when serious harm is at stake. One’s credence in a particular idea should be weighed against the potential consequences of the publication of one’s ideas both if one turns out to be right and if one turns out to be wrong. This activist approach to philosophical writing combines moral concern with epistemic humility.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
YORTPA
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-02-14
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-02-14

Total views
72 ( #40,656 of 53,599 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #17,026 of 53,599 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.