First Person and Third Person Reasons and Religious Epistemology

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper I argue that there are two kinds of epistemic reasons. One kind is irreducibly first personal -- what I call deliberative reasons. The other kind is third personal -- what I call theoretical reasons. I argue that attending to this distinction illuminates a host of problems in epistemology in general and in religious epistemology in particular. These problems include (a) the way religious experience operates as a reason for religious belief, (b) how we ought to understand religious testimony, (c) how religious authority can be justified, (d) the problem of religious disagreement, and (e) the reasonableness of religious conversion
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ZAGFPA
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-03-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-06-02

Total views
212 ( #20,587 of 50,175 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #20,946 of 50,175 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.