First Person and Third Person Reasons and Religious Epistemology

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper I argue that there are two kinds of epistemic reasons. One kind is irreducibly first personal -- what I call deliberative reasons. The other kind is third personal -- what I call theoretical reasons. I argue that attending to this distinction illuminates a host of problems in epistemology in general and in religious epistemology in particular. These problems include (a) the way religious experience operates as a reason for religious belief, (b) how we ought to understand religious testimony, (c) how religious authority can be justified, (d) the problem of religious disagreement, and (e) the reasonableness of religious conversion
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ZAGFPA
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-03-14
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-06-02

Total views
405 ( #17,117 of 65,735 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
52 ( #16,129 of 65,735 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.