Switch to: Citations

References in:

Open Theism and Other Models of Divine Providence

In Jeanine Diller & Asa Kasher (eds.), Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities. Springer. pp. 287-298 (2013)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Nature of Necessity.Alvin Plantinga - 1974 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
    This book, one of the first full-length studies of the modalities to emerge from the debate to which Saul Kripke, David Lewis, Ruth Marcus, and others are contributing, is an exploration and defense of the notion of modality de re, the idea that objects have both essential and accidental properties. Plantinga develops his argument by means of the notion of possible worlds and ranges over such key problems as the nature of essence, transworld identity, negative existential propositions, and the existence (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   681 citations  
  • The Coherence of Theism (revised edition).Richard Swinburne - 1977 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
    This book investigates what it means, and whether it is coherent, to say that there is a God.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   161 citations  
  • God, Time, and Knowledge.William Hasker - 1989 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    ... or engenders a tradition of philosophical reflection, questions will arise about the relation between divine knowledge and power and human freedom. ...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   94 citations  
  • (1 other version)Divine omniscience and voluntary action.Nelson Pike - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):27-46.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   94 citations  
  • Divine providence.Thomas P. Flint - 2008 - In Thomas P. Flint & Michael Rea (eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophical theology. New York: Oxford University Press.
    This article attempts to spell out more clearly the Thomist, the Openist, and the Molinist approaches to divine providence, and to indicate the strengths and weaknesses of these three positions. It begins by discussing both the traditional notion of divine providence and the libertarian picture of freedom. The article then argues that each theory of divine providence has its advantages and disadvantages. Each has had numerous able and creative defenders. As with most philosophical disputes, one can hardly expect this debate (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   52 citations  
  • The Openness of God: A Biblical Challenge to the Traditional Understanding of God.Clark H. Pinnock, Richard Rice, John Sanders, William Hasker & David Basinger - 1994 - Downers Grove: Intervarsity Press.
    Written by five scholars whose expertise extends across the disciplines of biblical, historical, systematic, and philosophical theology, this is a careful and ...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Time and Eternity: Exploring God’s Relationship to Time.William Lane Craig - 2001 - Crossway Books.
    This chapter contains sections titled: * Arguments for Divine Timelessness * Arguments for Divine Temporality * Eternity and the Nature of Time * Notes.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Presentism and Ockham's Way Out.Alicia Finch & Michael C. Rea - 2008 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 1:1-17.
    We lay out the fatalist’s argument, making sure to clarify which dialectical moves are available to the libertarian. We then offer a more robust presentation of Ockhamism, responding to obvious objections and teasing out the implications of the view. At this point, we discuss presentism and eternalism in more detail. We then present our argument for the claim that the libertarian cannot take Ockham’s way out of the fatalism argument unless she rejects presentism. Finally, we consider and dispense with objections (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • Process Theology: An Introductory Exposition.John B. Cobb & David R. Griffin - 1979 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (1):61-62.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   36 citations  
  • (1 other version)God, Foreknowledge, and Freedom.John Martin Fischer - 1991 - Religious Studies 27 (2):278-280.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  • Gratuitous evil and divine providence.Alan R. Rhoda - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (3):281-302.
    Discussions of the evidential argument from evil generally pay little attention to how different models of divine providence constrain the theist's options for response. After describing four models of providence and general theistic strategies for engaging the evidential argument, I articulate and defend a definition of 'gratuitous evil' that renders the theological premise of the argument uncontroversial for theists. This forces theists to focus their fire on the evidential premise, enabling us to compare models of providence with respect to how (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • The fivefold openness of the future.Alan R. Rhoda - 2011 - In William Hasker Thomas Jay Oord & Dean Zimmerman (eds.), God in an Open Universe. Pickwick Publications. pp. 69--93.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Presentism and fatalism.Michael C. Rea - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (4):511 – 524.
    It is widely believed that presentism is compatible with both a libertarian view of human freedom and an unrestricted principle of bivalence. I argue that, in fact, presentists must choose between bivalence and libertarianism: if presentism is true, then either the future is open or no one is free in the way that libertarians understand freedom.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Generic open theism and some varieties thereof.Alan R. Rhoda - 2008 - Religious Studies 44 (2):225-234.
    The goal of this paper is to facilitate ongoing dialogue between open and non-open theists. First, I try to make precise what open theism is by distinguishing the core commitments of the position from other secondary and optional commitments. The result is a characterization of ‘generic open theism’, the minimal set of commitments that any open theist, qua open theist, must affirm. Second, within the framework of generic open theism, I distinguish three important variants and discuss challenges distinctive to each. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • The God Who Risks.John Sanders - 1998
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Alexander of Aphrodisias, on Fate.R. W. Sharples - 1986 - The Classical Review 36 (01):33-.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • The foreknowledge conundrum.William Hasker - 2001 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 50 (1/3):97-114.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Ficciones.Jorge Luis Borges - 1999 - Alianza. Madrid.
    For the first time in English, all the fiction by the writer who has been called “the greatest Spanish-language writer of our century” collected in a single volume “An event, and cause for celebration.”—The New York Times A Penguin Classics Deluxe Edition with flaps and deckle-edged paper For some fifty years, in intriguing and ingenious fictions that reimagined the very form of the short story—from his 1935 debut with A Universal History of Iniquity through his immensely influential collections Ficciones and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   31 citations  
  • Searching for an Adequate God: A Dialogue between Process and Free Will Theists.John B. Cobb & Clark H. Pinnock - 2002 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 23 (1):89-94.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations