Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Are market norms and intrinsic valuation mutually exclusive?A. Walsh - 2001 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (4):525 – 543.
    Are market norms and intrinsic valuation mutually exclusive? Many philosophers have endorsed the thought that market institutions necessarily evacuate non-instrumental value and hence the market and the realm of intrinsic worth are mutually exclusive. Indeed the evacuation of value by the market has been a recurrent theme of much moral and political thinking about the morality of commercial exchange. Consider the following passage from Marx: "Money debases all the gods of man and turns them into commodities. Money is the universal, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Gifts and exchanges.Kenneth J. Arrow - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (4):343-362.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   70 citations  
  • The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Philosophy 63 (243):119-122.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1015 citations  
  • Why We Should Reject S.Derek Parfit - 1984 - In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
    An argument against the bias towards the near; how a defence of temporal neutrality is not a defence of S; an appeal to inconsistency; why we should reject S and accept CP.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   776 citations  
  • Ecology, Policy and Politics: Human Well-Being and the Natural World.John O'Neill - 1993 - Environmental Values 4 (2):181-182.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   75 citations  
  • Comparability of Values, Rough Equality, and Vagueness: Griffin and Broome on Incommensurability: Mozaffar Qizilbash.Mozaffar Qizilbash - 2000 - Utilitas 12 (2):223-240.
    There are several different forms of comparability involving prudential values. Comparisons of values in the abstract, of realizations of some value, and of options which realize values, are distinct, and related, though not mutually exclusive. Furthermore, if rough equality is thought of as an evaluative relation in terms of which comparisons can be made, it does not imply incomparability. If it involves epistemic vagueness, this does not imply incomparability, since our not knowing which relation holds does not imply that no (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Are there incommensurable values?James Griffin - 1977 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 7 (1):39-59.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • Is it Rational to Maximize?James Wood Bailey - 1998 - Utilitas 10 (2):195-221.
    Most versions of utilitarianism depend on the plausibility and coherence of some conceptionof maximizing well-being, but these conceptions have been attacked on various grounds. This paper considers two such contentions. First, it addresses the argument that because goods are plural and incommensurable, maximization is incoherent. It is shown that any conception of incommensurability strong enough to show the incoherence of maximization leads to an intolerable paradox. Several misunderstandings of what maximization requires are also addressed. Second, this paper responds to the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations