Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Hasty British Ban on Commercial Surrogacy.Diana Brahams - 1987 - Hastings Center Report 17 (1):16-19.
    While commercial surrogate parenting arrangements continue to flourish in the U.S., Britain has made it a criminal offense for third parties to benefit from surrogacy. Voluntary surrogacy, however is still within the law. Banning commercial surrogacy while leaving voluntary surrogacy lawful seems neither logical nor fair. A more equitable solution would be to license stringently and control both commercial and nonprofit agencies to provide these services.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Baby M: Babies (and Justice) for Sale.George J. Annas - 1987 - Hastings Center Report 17 (3):13-15.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Is Female to Male as Nature Is To Culture?Sherry B. Ortner - 1972 - Feminist Studies 1 (2):5.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   55 citations  
  • Recreating Motherhood: Ideology and Technology in a Patriarchal Society.Barbara Katz Rothman - 1990 - W. W. Norton.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   49 citations  
  • Choice, Gift, or Patriarchal Bargain? Women's Consent to In Vitro Fertilization in Male Infertility.Judith Lorber - 1989 - Hypatia 4 (3):23-36.
    This paper explores the reasons why women who are themselves fertile might consent to undergo in vitro fertilization (IVF) with an infertile male partner. The reasons often given are desire to have that particular man's child, or altruism, giving a gift to the partner. Although ethically, the decision should be completely woman's prerogative, because IVF programs usually treat the couple as a unit, she may be offered few other options by the medical staff. In social terms, whether the woman is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Social construction of Mary Beth Whitehead.Michelle Harrison - 1987 - Gender and Society 1 (3):300-311.
    Although the testimony of mental health experts in custody cases is supposed to be scientific and objective, the experts' testimony in the Mary Beth Whitehead case was imbued with prevailing middle-class biases about good mothers and good parenting. Close review of the experts' reports fails to substantiate many of their assessments and recommendations and demonstrates instead a consistent bias in favor of the Sterns and against Mary Beth Whitehead.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations