Switch to: Citations

References in:

The wrong of rape

Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):374–393 (2007)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Setting penalties: What does rape deserve? [REVIEW]Michael Davis - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (1):61 - 110.
    The paper is an application of the principle of just deserts (that is, retribution) to the setting of statutory penalties. The conclusion is that there should be no separate penalty for rape but that rape should be punished under the ordinary battery statutes. The argument has four parts. First, there is a description of the place of rape in a typical statutory scheme. Second, there is a consideration of possible justifications for giving rape the status it has in such a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • How Bad Is Rape?H. E. Baber - 1987 - Hypatia 2 (2):125-138.
    I argue that to be compelled to do routine work is to be gravely harmed. Indeed, that pink - collar work is a more serious harm to women than rape. My purpose is to urge politically active feminists and feminist organizations to arrange their priorities accordingly and devote most of their resources to working for the elimination of sex segregation in employment.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Men in Groups: Collective Responsibility for Rape.Larry May & Robert Strikwerda - 1994 - Hypatia 9 (2):134 - 151.
    We criticize the following views: only the rapist is responsible since only he committed the act; no one is responsible since rape is a biological response to stimuli; everyone is responsible since men and women contribute to the rape culture; and patriarchy is responsible but no person or group. We then argue that, in some societies, men are collectively responsible for rape since most benefit from rape and most are similar to the rapist.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations