Switch to: Citations

References in:

Conflict-tolerant semantics for argumentation frameworks

In Luis Farinas del Cerro, Andreas Herzig & Jerome Mengin (eds.), Logics in Artificial Intelligence. Springer. pp. 28--40 (2012)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Answer-set programming encodings for argumentation frameworks.Uwe Egly, Sarah Alice Gaggl & Stefan Woltran - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (2):147-177.
    Answer-set programming (ASP) has emerged as a declarative programming paradigm where problems are encoded as logic programs, such that the so-called answer sets of theses programs represent the solutions of the encoded problem. The efficiency of the latest ASP solvers reached a state that makes them applicable for problems of practical importance. Consequently, problems from many different areas, including diagnosis, data integration, and graph theory, have been successfully tackled via ASP. In this work, we present such ASP-encodings for problems associated (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • (1 other version)A Logical Account of Formal Argumentation.Martin W. A. Caminada & Dov M. Gabbay - 2009 - Studia Logica 93 (2-3):109-145.
    In the current paper, we re-examine how abstract argumentation can be formulated in terms of labellings, and how the resulting theory can be applied in the field of modal logic. In particular, we are able to express the (complete) extensions of an argumentation framework as models of a set of modal logic formulas that represents the argumentation framework. Using this approach, it becomes possible to define the grounded extension in terms of modal logic entailment.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   56 citations  
  • A useful four-valued logic.N. D. Belnap - 1977 - In J. M. Dunn & G. Epstein (eds.), Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic. D. Reidel.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   261 citations