Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Why We Should Reject S.Derek Parfit - 1984 - In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
    An argument against the bias towards the near; how a defence of temporal neutrality is not a defence of S; an appeal to inconsistency; why we should reject S and accept CP.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1222 citations  
  • On being morally considerable.Kenneth E. Goodpaster - 1978 - Journal of Philosophy 75 (6):308-325.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   179 citations  
  • Three. The biocentric outlook on nature.Paul W. Taylor - 1986 - In Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics. pp. 99-168.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   108 citations  
  • Are all species equal?David Schmidtz - 1998 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (1):57–67.
    Species egalitarianism is the view that all species have equal moral standing. To have moral standing is, at a minimum, to command respect, to be something more than a mere thing. Is there any reason to believe that all species have moral standing in even this most minimal sense? If so — that is, if all species command respect — is there any reason to believe they all command equal respect. The article summarises critical responses to Paul Taylor’s argument for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • Transgenic Animals: Ethical and Animal Welfare Concerns.Michael Fox - 1990 - In Peter Wheale & Ruth McNally, The Bio-Revolution : Cornucopia or Pandora’s Box? Pluto Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Anthropocentrism, Atomism, and Environmental Ethics.Donald Scherer - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (2):115-123.
    By attempting to divorce attributions of value from judgments of the interest of the attributor, developing the concept ofa locus of value, exploring the interconnections between the goods of individuals and the goods of populations and species, and suggesting the reasonableness ofthe attributions of rights to certain sorts of individuals, I try to indicate the degree to which an environmental ethic can be atomisticwithout being anthropocentric.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • The Challenge of Scientific Uncertainty and Disunity in Risk Assessment and Management of GM Crops.Anne Ingeborg Myhr - 2010 - Environmental Values 19 (1):7-31.
    The controversy over commercial releases of genetically modified crops demonstrates that there is a need for new approaches that are more broadly based, transparent and able to acknowledge the uncertainties involved. This article investigates whether new forms of knowledge production as prescribed in the concept of post-normal science can improve risk governance of GM crops. The GM science review carried out in the UK in 2003 serves as a case study and the focus is on how scientific uncertainty and public (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations