Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Insides and Essences: Early Understandings of the Non- Obvious.Susan A. Gelman & Henry M. Wellman - 1991 - Cognition 38 (3):213-244.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   180 citations  
  • Differences in preschoolers’ and adults’ use of generics about novel animals and artifacts: A window onto a conceptual divide.Amanda C. Brandone & Susan A. Gelman - 2009 - Cognition 110 (1):1-22.
    Children and adults commonly produce more generic noun phrases (e.g., birds fly) about animals than artifacts. This may reflect differences in participants’ generic knowledge about specific animals/artifacts (e.g., dogs/chairs), or it may reflect a more general distinction. To test this, the current experiments asked adults and preschoolers to generate properties about novel animals and artifacts (Experiment 1: real animals/artifacts; Experiments 2 and 3: matched pairs of maximally similar, novel animals/artifacts). Data demonstrate that even without prior knowledge about these items, the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Drinking and driving don't mix: inductive generalization in infancy.Jean M. Mandler & Laraine McDonough - 1996 - Cognition 59 (3):307-335.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  • Causal relations drive young children’s induction, naming, and categorization.John E. Opfer & Megan J. Bulloch - 2007 - Cognition 105 (1):206-217.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology.Graeme S. Halford, William H. Wilson & Steven Phillips - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):803-831.
    Working memory limits are best defined in terms of the complexity of the relations that can be processed in parallel. Complexity is defined as the number of related dimensions or sources of variation. A unary relation has one argument and one source of variation; its argument can be instantiated in only one way at a time. A binary relation has two arguments, two sources of variation, and two instantiations, and so on. Dimensionality is related to the number of chunks, because (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   96 citations  
  • When learning to classify by relations is easier than by features.Bradley C. Love & Marc T. Tomlinson - 2010 - Thinking and Reasoning 16 (4):372-401.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Categories and induction in young children.Susan A. Gelman & Ellen M. Markman - 1986 - Cognition 23 (3):183-209.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   220 citations