Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Fallout from the Mutual Fund Trading Scandal.Todd Houge & Jay Wellman - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 62 (2):129-139.
    In September 2003, several prominent mutual fund companies came under investigation for illegal trading practices. Allegations suggested these funds allowed certain investors to profit from short-term trading schemes at the expense of other investors. Surprisingly, regulatory authorities have known for more than two decades of the potential for such abuses, yet have taken limited steps to correct the problem. We explore investor reaction to the scandal by measuring assets under management, stock returns, and performance. Mutual funds managed by investigated firms (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • NASD Rule 2110 and the VA Linux IPO.Tim Loughran - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 62 (2):141-146.
    On December 9, 1999, VA Linux issued shares to the public and left over $900 million on the table for investors. In the prospectus, the investment banker Credit Suisse First Boston (CSFB) stated it would receive a 7% gross spread as its compensation for underwriting the shares. Yet the SEC alleges some investors paid enormous commissions to CSFB in the form of a kick-back immediately after obtaining the IPO shares. Hence, CSFB had an economic interest in the IPO and there (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Mutual Fund Incubation and the Role of the Securities and Exchange Commission.Carl Ackermann & Tim Loughran - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 70 (1):33-37.
    A mutual fund family incubates a fund when it creates a privately subsidized fund not available to the general investing public. It destroys unsuccessful incubator funds. The few successful funds will report higher incubation returns than the market return in advertisements intended to attract money from individual investors. This practice is currently allowed by the SEC. The evidence is that incubation returns are not a good predictor of subsequent fund performance and likely serve to mislead unsuspecting investors.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations