Switch to: Citations

References in:

Animalism

In A. C. Grayling, Andrew Pyle & Naomi Goulder (eds.), The Continuum encyclopedia of British philosophy. Bristol: Thoemmes Continuum (2006)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Human Beings.Mark Johnston - 1987 - Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):59-83.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   106 citations  
  • (1 other version)Persons, animals, and ourselves.Paul F. Snowdon - 1990 - In Christopher Gill (ed.), The Person and the human mind: issues in ancient and modern philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   64 citations  
  • How to Change Your Mind.William R. Carter - 1989 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):1 - 14.
    It no longer is true in a metaphorical sense only that a person can have a change of heart. We might grant this much — allow that a person may have one heart at one time and have another heart at still another time — and also resist the idea that a person can have a change of mind in anything other than a qualitative sense. In the discussion that follows, this standard view of the matter is called into question. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  • (1 other version)Constitution is not identity.Mark Johnston - 1992 - Mind 101 (401):89-106.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   148 citations  
  • (1 other version)Constitution Is Not Identity.Mark Johnston - 1997 - In Michael Cannon Rea (ed.), Material Constitution: A Reader. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 44-62.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   133 citations  
  • (1 other version)Animalism Versus Lockeanism: A Current Controversy.Harold W. Noonan - 1998 - Philosophical Quarterly 48 (192):302-318.
    My purpose is to explore the possible lines of reply available to a defender of the neo‐Lockean position on personal identity in response to the recently popular ‘animalist’ objection. I compare the animalist objection with an objection made to Locke by Bishop Butler, Thomas Reid and, in our own day, Sydney Shoemaker. I argue that the only possible response available to a defender of Locke against the Butler–Reid–Shoemaker objection is to reject Locke's official definition of a person as a thinking, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   41 citations  
  • (1 other version)Animalism versus lockeanism: A current controversy.Harold W. Noonan - 1998 - Philosophical Quarterly 48 (192):302-318.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   48 citations  
  • Our bodies, our selves.W. R. Carter - 1988 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 66 (3):308-319.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Personal Identity and Dead People.David Mackie - 1999 - Philosophical Studies 95 (3):219-242.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   56 citations  
  • Will I Be a Dead Person?W. R. Carter - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):167-171.
    Eric Olsen argues from the fact that we once existed as fetal individuals to the conclusion that the Standard View of personal identity is mistaken. I shall establish that a similar argument focusing upon dead people opposes Olson’s favored Biological View of personal identity.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations