Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. When distraction helps: Evidence that concurrent articulation and irrelevant speech can facilitate insight problem solving.Linden J. Ball, John E. Marsh, Damien Litchfield, Rebecca L. Cook & Natalie Booth - 2015 - Thinking and Reasoning 21 (1):76-96.
    We report an experiment investigating the “special-process” theory of insight problem solving, which claims that insight arises from non-conscious, non-reportable processes that enable problem re-structuring. We predicted that reducing opportunities for speech-based processing during insight problem solving should permit special processes to function more effectively and gain conscious awareness, thereby facilitating insight. We distracted speech-based processing by using either articulatory suppression or irrelevant speech, with findings for these conditions supporting the predicted insight facilitation effect relative to silent working or thinking (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Thoughts beyond words: When language overshadows insight.Jonathan W. Schooler, Stellan Ohlsson & Kevin Brooks - 1993 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122 (2):166.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   63 citations  
  • Why good thoughts block better ones: The mechanism of the pernicious Einstellung (set) effect.Merim Bilalić, Peter McLeod & Fernand Gobet - 2008 - Cognition 108 (3):652-661.
    The Einstellung effect occurs when the first idea that comes to mind, triggered by familiar features of a problem, prevents a better solution being found. It has been shown to affect both people facing novel problems and experts within their field of expertise. We show that it works by influencing mechanisms that determine what information is attended to. Having found one solution, expert chess players reported that they were looking for a better one. But their eye movements showed that they (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  • Why do people fail to see simple solutions? Using think-aloud protocols to uncover the mechanism behind the Einstellung (mental set) effect.Christine Blech, Robert Gaschler & Merim Bilalić - 2019 - Thinking and Reasoning 26 (4):552-580.
    Einstellung effects designate the phenomenon where established routines can prevent people from finding other, possibly more efficient solutions. Here we investigate the mechanism behi...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Expert and “novice” problem solving strategies in chess: Sixty years of citing de Groot (1946).Fernand Gobet, Peter McLeod & Merim Bilalić - 2008 - Thinking and Reasoning 14 (4):395-408.
    In a famous study of expert problem solving, de Groot (1946/1978) examined how chess players found the best move. He reported that there was little difference in the way that the best players (Grand Masters) and very good players (Candidate Masters) searched the board. Although this result has been regularly cited in studies of expertise, it is frequently misquoted. It is often claimed that de Groot found no difference in the way that experts and novices investigate a problem. Comparison of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • The Einstellung effect in anagram problem solving: evidence from eye movements.Jessica J. Ellis & Eyal M. Reingold - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Self‐Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems.Michelene T. H. Chi, Miriam Bassok, Matthew W. Lewis, Peter Reimann & Robert Glaser - 1989 - Cognitive Science 13 (2):145-182.
    The present paper analyzes the self‐generated explanations (from talk‐aloud protocols) that “Good” and “Poor” students produce while studying worked‐out examples of mechanics problems, and their subsequent reliance on examples during problem solving. We find that “Good” students learn with understanding: They generate many explanations which refine and expand the conditions for the action parts of the example solutions, and relate these actions to principles in the text. These self‐explanations are guided by accurate monitoring of their own understanding and misunderstanding. Such (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   84 citations  
  • Expert and “novice” problem solving strategies in chess: Sixty years of citing de Groot (1946).Merim Bilali - 2008 - Thinking and Reasoning 14 (4):395 – 408.
    In a famous study of expert problem solving, de Groot (1946/1978) examined how chess players found the best move. He reported that there was little difference in the way that the best players (Grand Masters) and very good players (Candidate Masters) searched the board. Although this result has been regularly cited in studies of expertise, it is frequently misquoted. It is often claimed that de Groot found no difference in the way that experts and novices investigate a problem. Comparison of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • The phonological loop as a language learning device.Alan Baddeley, Susan Gathercole & Costanza Papagno - 1998 - Psychological Review 105 (1):158-173.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   74 citations