Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The right not to know: an autonomy based approach.R. Andorno - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (5):435-439.
    The emerging international biomedical law tends to recognise the right not to know one’s genetic status. However, the basis and conditions for the exercise of this right remain unclear in domestic laws. In addition to this, such a right has been criticised at the theoretical level as being in contradiction with patient’s autonomy, with doctors’ duty to inform patients, and with solidarity with family members. This happens especially when non-disclosure poses a risk of serious harm to the patient’s relatives who, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   75 citations  
  • The child's right to an open future.Joel Feinberg - 2006 - In Randall Curren (ed.), Philosophy of Education: An Anthology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   132 citations  
  • Genetics and Confidentiality.Dan W. Brock - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3):34-35.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The family covenant and genetic testing.David J. Doukas & Jessica W. Berg - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3):2 – 10.
    The physician-patient relationship has changed over the last several decades, requiring a systematic reevaluation of the competing demands of patients, physicians, and families. In the era of genetic testing, using a model of patient care known as the family covenant may prove effective in accounting for these demands. The family covenant articulates the roles of the physician, patient, and the family prior to genetic testing, as the participants consensually define them. The initial agreement defines the boundaries of autonomy and benefit (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   44 citations  
  • Would you like to know what is wrong with you? On telling the truth to patients with dementia.M. Marzanski - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (2):108-113.
    Objectives—To discover what dementia sufferers feel is wrong with them; what they have been told and by whom, and what they wish to know about their illness.Background—Ethical guidelines regarding telling truth appear to be equivocal. Declarations of cognitively intact subjects, attitudes of family members and current psychiatric practice all vary, but no previous research has been published concerning what patients with dementia would in fact like to know about their diagnosis and prognosis.Design—Questionnaire study of the patients' opinions.Setting—Old Age Psychiatry Service (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations