Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Effectiveness of Market-Based Social Governance Schemes.Deepa Aravind & Petra Christmann - 2011 - Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (1):133-156.
    Market-based social governance schemes that establish standards of conduct for producers and traders in international supply chains aim to reduce the negative socioenvironmental effects of globalization. While studies have examined how characteristics of social governance schemes promote socially responsible producer behavior, it has not yet been examined how these same characteristics affect consumer behavior. This is a crucial omission, because without consumer demand for socially produced products, the reach of the social benefits is likely to be limited. We develop a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  • Challenges to Legitimacy at the Forest Stewardship Council.Donald H. Schepers - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 92 (2):279-290.
    The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) is a global private governance system overseeing the sustainability and biodiversity of the world forestry system through certification of forests and forestry processes and products, and is perceived as the strongest of the various certification schemes available (Domask, Globalization and NGOs: Transforming Business, Government, and Society , 2003 ; Gulbrandsen, Global Environmental Politics , 2004 ). It has seen more success in developed than developing countries in terms of amount of forest certified and number of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • The Financial Impact of ISO 14001 Certification: Top-Line, Bottom-Line, or Both?Pieter de Jong, Antony Paulraj & Constantin Blome - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 119 (1):131-149.
    It is not easy being green, but it does beg the question: Does being green pay off on the bottom-line? Unfortunately, that question of becoming ISO 14001 to reap financial benefit remains widely unanswered. In particular, corporate practice is interested in how environmental management impacts firms’ finance through top-line impact, bottom-line impact, or both—as this paves the way for an investment of environmental management. As current findings are mixed, our study tracks financial performance of publicly traded US firms between 1996 (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • An Institutional Perspective on the Diffusion of International Management System Standards: The Case of the Environmental Management Standard ISO 14001.Magali A. Delmas & I. Maria J. Montes-Sancho - 2011 - Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (1).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Stakeholders' Influence and Contribution to Social Standards Development: The Case of Multiple Stakeholder Approach to ISO 26000 Development. [REVIEW]Michaela A. Balzarova & Pavel Castka - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 111 (2):265-279.
    We present an empirical investigation on how multiple stakeholders can influence and contribute to a standard development process. Based on the analysis of comments submitted by stakeholders developing ISO 26000 standard for social responsibility, we found no significant differences between the ratio of accepted and non-accepted comments among various stakeholder groups; however, we conclude that industry is the most influential stakeholder due to the volume of the comments. We also present a set of processes that stakeholders follow to influence and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Governance of Eco-Labels: Expert Opinion and Media Coverage.Pavel Castka & Charles J. Corbett - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics 135 (2):309-326.
    “Eco-labels” are an increasingly important form of private regulation for sustainability in areas such as carbon emissions, water consumption, ethical sourcing, or organic produce. The growing interest and popularity of eco-labels has also been coupled with growing concerns about their credibility, in part because the standard-setting and conformity assessment practices that eco-labels adopt exhibit striking differences. In this paper, we assess which assurance practices contribute to eco-labels being perceived as better governed, in the eyes of experts as well as the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations