Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Karl Rahner and the extra-terrestrial intelligence question.Christopher L. Fisher & David Fergusson - 2006 - Heythrop Journal 47 (2):275–290.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Mis-Using Religious Language: Something about Kierkegaard and 'The Myth of God Incarnate'.C. Stephen Evans - 1979 - Religious Studies 15 (2):139 - 157.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Mis-using religious language: Something about Kierkegaard and ‘the myth of God incarnate’: C. Stephen Evans.C. Stephen Evans - 1979 - Religious Studies 15 (2):139-157.
    At the risk of a tremendous over-simplification, I believe it is helpful to categorize views of Christianity which have appeared in the west in the last two hundred years into three major groups. First there are the unbelievers, those for whom Christianity is straightforwardly untrue, unknowable, or unbelievable . This group would include those who try to salvage some form of essentially humanistic religion as well as those who simply turn away from religious belief altogether, either to put their ultimate (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Theological Implications of Possible Extraterrestrial Life.Sjoerd L. Bonting - 2003 - Zygon 38 (3):587-602.
    Bible and tradition remain silent on intelligent extraterrestrial life, and few modern theologians have expressed themselves on this topic. Scientific insight suggests the possibility, even likelihood, of the development of life on extrasolar earthlike planets. It is argued that such life forms would resemble earthly life and also develop a religious and moral life. As creatures with free will they would be prone to sin and in need of salvation. It is argued that this would not require multiple incarnations, since (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Imaginativity.Calvin Seerveld - 1987 - Faith and Philosophy 4 (1):43-58.
    Traditional philosophical uneasiness with imagining activity is documented. The reason adduced for the ontological homelessness of imagination is the inability of most philosophers to recognize the irreducible nature and function of imaginativity.Imagining is then distinguished from sense-perceiving. imaging. and conceptual activity. Imagining, it is proposed, is the reality of making-believe; and such human, as-if functioning can both (I) characterize human deeds as imaginative acts. and (2) be a latent or active functional moment within other kinds of human acts.Why God. creational (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations