Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)Swinging on the Pendulum: Shifting Views of Justice in Human Subjects Research.Anna Mastroianni & Jeffrey Kahn - 2001 - Hastings Center Report 31 (3):22-24.
    Federal policies on human subjects research have undergone a progressive transformation. In the early decades of the twentieth century, federal policies largely relied on the discretion of investigators to decide when and how to conduct research. This approach gradually gave way to policies that augmented investigator discretion with externally imposed protections. We may now be entering an era of even more stringent external protections. Whether the new policies effectively absolve investigators of personal responsibility for conducting ethical research, and whether it (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Statement in Support of Revising the Uniform Determination of Death Act and in Opposition to a Proposed Revision.D. Alan Shewmon - 2021 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 48 (5):453-477.
    Discrepancies between the Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA) and the adult and pediatric diagnostic guidelines for brain death (BD) (the “Guidelines”) have motivated proposals to revise the UDDA. A revision proposed by Lewis, Bonnie and Pope (the RUDDA), has received particular attention, the three novelties of which would be: (1) to specify the Guidelines as the legally recognized “medical standard,” (2) to exclude hypothalamic function from the category of “brain function,” and (3) to authorize physicians to conduct an apnea (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • (1 other version)Swinging on the Pendulum: Shifting Views of Justice in Human Subjects Research.Jeffrey Kahn & Anna Mastroianni - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 31 (3):21-28.
    Federal policies on human subjects research have undergone a progressive transformation. In the early decades of the twentieth century, federal policies largely relied on the discretion of investigators to decide when and how to conduct research. This approach gradually gave way to policies that augmented investigator discretion with externally imposed protections. We may now be entering an era of even more stringent external protections. Whether the new policies effectively absolve investigators of personal responsibility for conducting ethical research, and whether it (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations