Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Visual Agnosia: Disorders of Object Recognition and What They Tell Us About Normal Vision.Martha J. Farah - 1990 - MIT Press.
    Visual Agnosia is a comprehensive and up-to-date review of disorders of higher vision that relates these disorders to current conceptions of higher vision from cognitive science, illuminating both the neuropsychological disorders and the nature of normal visual object recognition.Brain damage can lead to selective problems with visual perception, including visual agnosia the inability to recognize objects even though elementary visual functions remain unimpaired. Such disorders are relatively rare, yet they provide a window onto how the normal brain might accomplish the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   117 citations  
  • Memory and consciousness.Endel Tulving - 1985 - Canadian Psychology 26:1-12.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   454 citations  
  • Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory.Emrah Duzel, Andrew P. Yonelinas, G. R. Mangun, H. J. Heinze & Endel Tulving - 1997 - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94:5973-8.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • Are faces special?Elinor McKone & Rachel Robbins - 2011 - In Andy Calder, Gillian Rhodes, Mark Johnson & Jim Haxby (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford University Press. pp. 149--176.
    The question of “Are faces special?” has essentially referred to whether there are unique visual mechanisms for processing identity-related information in faces as compared to other objects. Faces provide unique information about expression, gaze direction, identity, and visual cues to speech. In the literature, however, the debate about whether “faces are special” has referred to the specific question of whether there are special visual processing mechanisms unique to faces, presumably deriving from the social importance of faces and developed either across (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory.Larry L. Jacoby - 1991 - Journal of Memory and Language 30:513-41.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   245 citations  
  • Measuring the speed of the conscious components of recognition memory: Remembering is faster than knowing.Stephen Dewhurst, Selina Holmes, Karen Brandt & Dean Graha - 2006 - Consciousness and Cognition 15 (1):147-162.
    Three experiments investigated response times for remember and know responses in recognition memory. RTs to remember responses were faster than RTs to know responses, regardless of whether the remember–know decision was preceded by an old/new decision or was made without a preceding old/new decision. The finding of faster RTs for R responses was also found when remember–know decisions were made retrospectively. These findings are inconsistent with dual-process models of recognition memory, which predict that recollection is slower and more effortful than (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments.John T. Wixted & Laura Mickes - 2010 - Psychological Review 117 (4):1025-1054.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  • Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory.John T. Wixted - 2007 - Psychological Review 114 (1):152-176.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   46 citations  
  • Measuring the speed of the conscious components of recognition memory: Remembering is faster than knowing.Stephen A. Dewhurst, Selina J. Holmes, Karen R. Brandt & Graham M. Dean - 2006 - Consciousness and Cognition 15 (1):147-162.
    Three experiments investigated response times for remember and know responses in recognition memory. RTs to remember responses were faster than RTs to know responses, regardless of whether the remember–know decision was preceded by an old/new decision or was made without a preceding old/new decision . The finding of faster RTs for R responses was also found when remember–know decisions were made retrospectively. These findings are inconsistent with dual-process models of recognition memory, which predict that recollection is slower and more effortful (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Validating neural correlates of familiarity.Ken A. Paller, Joel L. Voss & Stephan G. Boehm - 2007 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 (6):243-250.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.George Mandler - 1980 - Psychological Review 87 (3):252-271.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   206 citations