Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Adaptation and Evolutionary Theory.Robert N. Brandon - 1978 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 9 (3):181.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   198 citations  
  • "Fitness" in Fact and Fiction.Mary B. Williams & Alexander Rosenberg - 1985 - Journal of Philosophy 82 (12):738-749.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Fitness (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).A. Rosenberg & F. Bouchard - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Web 17 (8):457-473.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   41 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Fitness.Alexander Rosenberg - 1983 - Journal of Philosophy.
    The diversity, complexity and adaptation of the biological realm is evident. Until Darwin, the best explanation for these three features of the biological was the conclusion of the “argument from design.” Darwin's theory of natural selection provides an explanation of all three of these features of the biological realm without adverting to some mysterious designing entity. But this explanation's success turns on the meaning of its central explanatory concept, ‘fitness’. Moreover, since Darwinian theory provides the resources for a purely causal (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Fitness.Alexander Rosenberg - 1983 - Journal of Philosophy 80 (8):457-473.
    The diversity, complexity and adaptation of the biological realm is evident. Until Darwin, the best explanation for these three features of the biological was the conclusion of the “argument from design.” Darwin's theory of natural selection provides an explanation of all three of these features of the biological realm without adverting to some mysterious designing entity. But this explanation's success turns on the meaning of its central explanatory concept, ‘fitness’. Moreover, since Darwinian theory provides the resources for a purely causal (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   63 citations  
  • The propensity interpretation of fitness.Susan K. Mills & John H. Beatty - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (2):263-286.
    The concept of "fitness" is a notion of central importance to evolutionary theory. Yet the interpretation of this concept and its role in explanations of evolutionary phenomena have remained obscure. We provide a propensity interpretation of fitness, which we argue captures the intended reference of this term as it is used by evolutionary theorists. Using the propensity interpretation of fitness, we provide a Hempelian reconstruction of explanations of evolutionary phenomena, and we show why charges of circularity which have been levelled (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   204 citations  
  • Fact, fiction, and Fitness.Elliott Sober - 1984 - Journal of Philosophy 81 (7):372-384.
    Alexander Rosenberg begins his recent article on the concept of fitness with the remark that "debates about the cognitive status of the Darwinian theory of natural selection should have ended long ago." I agree that this obsession needs to be overcome. But Rosenberg repeats some of the old mis- takes and invents epicycles on others. In this comment I will not be able to circumscribe fully the range of topics that an adequate treatment of this cluster of problems demands. A (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • The Propensity Interpretation of ‘Fitness‘—No Interpretation is No Substitute.Robert Brandon & John Beatty - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (2):342-347.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations