Switch to: Citations

References in:

Correspondence

[author unknown]
Research Ethics 2 (3):111-114 (2006)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Categorization of Investigation: Defining the Ethical Questions.Ray Godfrey - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (1):15-18.
    This paper draws attention to a simple distinction that, when ignored, considerably distorts discussion of what should be subject to what form of ethical review and by whom. The distinction is between two types of ethical questions that can be asked about any investigation, and indeed about many other types of activity. First, there are questions of the kind: Is it ethical to conduct this investigation at all? Second, there are questions such as: How can this investigation be conducted in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The Importance of Both Research and its Proper Review: A Historical Perspective.Hugh Davies - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (2):40-46.
    It is self-evident that medical treatments have improved in recent centuries. Through a historical analysis this article demonstrates that experimental research has underpinned the success of modern medical therapy, but it also shows that there have been examples of unethical research and that these can still be found, even today. Whilst it is crucial that research continues, it is equally important that there is appropriate review. Although the health of research itself is central to our well-being, the community needs to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations