Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Naming and Necessity: Lectures Given to the Princeton University Philosophy Colloquium.Saul A. Kripke - 1980 - Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Edited by Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel.
    A transcript of three lectures, given at Princeton University in 1970, which deals with (inter alia) debates concerning proper names in the philosophy of language.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1531 citations  
  • (4 other versions)Naming and necessity.Saul Kripke - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Arguing about language. New York: Routledge. pp. 431-433.
    _Naming and Necessity_ has had a great and increasing influence. It redirected philosophical attention to neglected questions of natural and metaphysical necessity and to the connections between these and theories of naming, and of identity. This seminal work, to which today's thriving essentialist metaphysics largely owes its impetus, is here reissued in a newly corrected form with a new preface by the author. If there is such a thing as essential reading in metaphysics, or in philosophy of language, this is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1457 citations  
  • (4 other versions)Naming and Necessity.S. Kripke - 1972 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (4):665-666.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2750 citations  
  • (1 other version)Models and reality.Hilary Putnam - 1980 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 45 (3):464-482.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   297 citations  
  • The structure of scientific revolutions.Dudley Shapere - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (3):383-394.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   103 citations  
  • Theory-change as structure-change: Comments on the Sneed formalism.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1976 - Erkenntnis 10 (2):179 - 199.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   73 citations  
  • Are there rival, incommensurable theories?Dale W. Moberg - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (2):244-262.
    Following an account of the incommensurability argument, an objection, based on assumptions concerning rival theories, is examined and rejected. This rejection leads to an alternative direction of criticism of incommensurability, a direction that involves the articulation of comparative standards of theory evaluation that are independent of meaning invariance.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • The structure of scientific revolutions.Joseph Agassi - 1966 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 4 (4):351-354.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Georg Christoph Lichtenberg.Georg Henrik von Wright - 1967 - In Paul Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of philosophy. New York,: Macmillan. pp. 464.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations