Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)Scoring Rules, Condorcet Efficiency and Social Homogeneity.Dominique Lepelley, Patrick Pierron & Fabrice Valognes - 2000 - Theory and Decision 49 (2):175-196.
    In a three-candidate election, a scoring rule s (s in [0,1]) assigns 1, s, and 0 points (respectively) to each first, second and third place in the individual preference rankings. The Condorcet efficiency of a scoring rule is defined as the conditional probability that this rule selects the winner in accordance with Condorcet criteria (three Condorcet criteria are considered in the paper). We are interested in the following question: What rule s has the greatest Condorcet efficiency? After recalling the known (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • (1 other version)Scoring Rules, Condorcet Efficiency and Social Homogeneity.D. Lepelley, P. Pierron & F. Valognes - 2000 - Theory and Decision 49 (2):175-196.
    In a three-candidate election, a scoring rule λ, λ∈[0,1], assigns 1,λ and 0 points (respectively) to each first, second and third place in the individual preference rankings. The Condorcet efficiency of a scoring rule is defined as the conditional probability that this rule selects the winner in accordance with Condorcet criteria (three Condorcet criteria are considered in the paper). We are interested in the following question: What rule λ has the greatest Condorcet efficiency? After recalling the known answer to this (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Political Theory of Condorcet.Jean-Antoine-Nicolas de Caritat Condorcet, Fiona Sommerlad & Iain Mclean - 1989 - University of Oxford, Faculty of Social Studies.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Condorcet's paradox and the likelihood of its occurrence: different perspectives on balanced preferences.William V. Gehrlein - 2002 - Theory and Decision 52 (2):171-199.
    Many studies have considered the probability that a pairwise majority rule (PMR) winner exists for three candidate elections. The absence of a PMR winner indicates an occurrence of Condorcet's Paradox for three candidate elections. This paper summarizes work that has been done in this area with the assumptions of: Impartial Culture, Impartial Anonymous Culture, Maximal Culture, Dual Culture and Uniform Culture. Results are included for the likelihood that there is a strong winner by PMR, a weak winner by PMR, and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations